A boardroom audit gives the table to assess their performance in a comprehensive way. It helps table members identify weaknesses in their leadership relationships and their culture as well as other aspects of longevity. It also ensures that those who pay for membership at a table are properly equipped to fulfill their obligations.
The research area is in development however there are many challenges. The current empirical evidence suggests inconsistent results regarding how dissent impacts boards and their functioning. Some studies have positive (Zona 2016) curvilinear, non-significant or mixed results. Some studies show negative (Brown Buchholtz And Butts 2019, Heemskerk Heemskerk and Wats, Minichilli, et al. 2012) relations between dissent and the performance of a board’s tasks.
Moreover, the existing research is lacking a deeper understanding of what drives the dynamics of the dissent. Future research should develop an integrated theoretical framework to understand the underlying causes of this governance phenomenon. This might include the use of a configurational approach (Federo and Saz-Carranza, 2018; Schiell Lewellyn, and Yan 2023) to help researchers more precisely understand how individual board attributes, processes, and contexts relate to necessary and sufficient causality in governance issues.
Additionally, some studies use the definition of dissent as narrow and do not present precise measurements. These studies are therefore susceptible to measurement errors. It would be beneficial to develop more reliable measurement techniques for dissent in future studies.
boardroombook.com/5-effective-communication-skills-in-meetings/
Comentários